Baseball’s Most Unbreakable Records

Merriman is a proven steroid user. Why is there no public outcry to have him banned from football?

In the NFL, players caught juicing get suspended 4 games and return to action. Football fans continue to embrace the player and seem to forget overnight that he was caught breaking the rules. The NBA doesn’t even test for steroids. I have no doubt that there are past and present players in that league that have used an illegal performance enhancer at one point or another. Especially when they are re-habbing an injury. Basketball fans don’t seem to care much about the juice. So this begs the question……Why do people get so angry about steroids in baseball?

Some people are just plain idiots. However the main reason people get hot about steroids in baseball is the numbers. I understand that. Other sports do have important records. But no other sport perceives numbers to be sacred like baseball. So many people get pissed off when they find out many recent sluggers were possibly artificially enhancing their home run totals. If you’ve read any of my other posts then you would know that I believe most steroid bashers to be illogical hypocrites. But I’m not pro-PED. I wish the era of illegal substance use in baseball never happened. But no matter what we do it will always be there. Erasing history, tainted or not, just isn’t right. Nazis burn books and totalitarian regimes try to hide and manipulate history. I’d like to believe that here in the US we are better than that.

Altering the public's perception of history is what Nazis do.

So let’s keep all the records set by alleged juicers. No asterisks, erasing their totals from the record book or denying them the Hall of Fame. In the future we’ll tell their story and make sure that no one ever forgets that PEDs likely enhanced their numbers. You may be saying “but Barry Bonds doesn’t deserve to be the home-run king”. Yes he was an arrogant piece of trash that used illegal substances but he is the All-Time Home Run king. You can’t blame him for MLB’s lack of effort to eliminate PEDs from the game. You don’t like it tough. Maybe you should try embracing Josh Gibson as the all-time leader. Or better yet, embrace Sadaharu Oh’s 868 HR’s he hit in Japan. Maybe that will hold you over until Albert Pujols breaks the record or you decide to stop acting like a child about the HR list.

Sadaharu Oh

Don't want to embrace the US HR champ? No problem embrace Oh!

Moving along, if you’re pissed about the tainted HR totals then it’s time to start embracing other records. Chicks dig the long ball but there’s much more to baseball than HRs.  For example look at the list below.

Single Season

Triples: Chief Wilson 36 in 1912

Batting Average: Nap Lajoie .426 in 1901

Wins: Jack Chesbro 41 in 1904

Hitting Streak: 56 Joe Dimaggio 1941

Doubles: Earl Webb 67 1931

Extra Base Hits: Babe Ruth 1921 119

Runs: Babe Ruth 177 1921

Total Bases: 457 Babe Ruth 1921


Triples: Sam Crawford 309

Wins: Cy Young 511

ERA: 1.82 Ed Walsh

Doubles:792 Tris Speaker

AVG: .366 Ty Cobb

Sam Crawford

Wahoo Sam's Triple record is more impressive than the HR record

These are some absolutely insane numbers. Isn’t batting .426 for a season more impressive than 72 HRs? How about 36 triples in a season? If we as fans held these numbers to the same high regard as HRs then players would strive to break these records.


Banks Calls out Sosa: Game Show Idea

Ernie Banks has decided it’s time for Sammy Sosa to come clean about his PED use. In case you missed the story here’s a link.

I say great idea Mr. Banks. However I think we should start a Game show out of this.

If a player that played from  late 60’s-80’s calls out a player from the 90s to come clean about PED use then the player doing the calling out of the alleged steroid user must do one of the following in front of a live audience:

  1. Come clean about his own use of amphetamines or any other illegal drug
  2. If he honestly was 100%  clean then he must get a known user from his era to come clean

Once one of the above conditions has been met, the player from the “Steroid Era” must then come clean about his own Performance Enhancing Drug Use.

Also, all contestants must take a polygraph to make sure that there is no cheating going on.

Prizes awarded to all contestants include: I’m a Cheater T-Shirts or I’m a Snitch Belt-Buckles and either a free hookup from a speed dealer named Paco or a free hook-up from a guy from my gym that knows a guy who’s cousin has a buddy that can get you the juice.

Two more things the show must have: half-naked girls and lots of beer.

The media coverage of the “Steroid Era” is already a circus so this game-show couldn’t hurt.

Attention TV Networks: That’s you MLBTV, SpikeTV, FoxSports Alaska, Versus, HBO, ComedyCentral, PBS,  BBC or whoever (I don’t care what network it is as long as I get paid) the show is available. Contact me if  interested. Better make it quick, HTV in Vietnam is showing very strong interest in the show. And if you can’t beat their offer of 3 bags of rice then don’t even waste my time.

NFC Championship: Battle of EIU Alumns

EIU Panther Logo

Eastern Illinois is most commonly called “that one school Tony Romo played for”. Maybe after this weekend it will be known as “the school that Romo and those NFL coaches went to”.

If you are like me then you probably know very little about Eastern Illinois University. So here’s the quick facts about EIU:

Don't let the castle fool you. This school is a NFL Head Coach Factory

Quick Facts

  • Location: Charleston, IL (pop. 21,039)
  • Established: 1895
  • Enrollment: 11,651
  • Conference Affiliation: Ohio Valley
  • Colors: Blue & Grey
  • Interesting Fact: Only NCAA Division I Women’s Rugby team in the nation. (I had no idea that Rugby even existed in this country)
  • Notable Alumni: Jim Edgar, John Malkovich, Larry Smith, Jimmy John, Kevin Duckworth, Dan Steele, Matt Hughes, Matt Painter, Jeff Gossett, Tony Romo, Mike Shanahan, Brad Childress, Sean Payton.

I just couldn't resist posting a picture of women's rugby

Note the last 3 on that alumni list. Mike Shanahan(technically I think he only coached there), Brad Childress and Sean Payton. 3 not only relevant but good NFL coaches. Shanahan has already won a Superbowl and this weekend another EIU alumn will be one step closer to get a ring of their own. It just seems crazy to me that a FCS football program could produce this kind of NFL talent.

Being a basketball fanatic, I also find it very interesting that Purdue Basketball Head Coach, Matt Painter graduated and coached at EIU.

It’s a Friday night so I don’t feel like doing any major research tonight. So I’ll just end this post by saying:

Eastern Illinois University: The Pub salutes you.

(Perhaps I’ll touch this post up tomorrow)

The Pub’s AFC and NFC Championship Preview


New York Jets(9-7) @ Indianapolis Colts(14-2)

The Jets bandwagon has filled beyond capacity. After this game is over there will be a stampede of idiots jumping off the Jets bandwagon. Rex Ryan is a great coach and the Jets seem to have built up a great deal of momentum. Hell, Darrelle Revis is now even considered the second coming Deion Sanders. I’ll admit that the Jets have been impressive and they are playing at a very high level. However they will be no match for Peyton Manning and the Colts. The Colts opened the playoff door for the Jets and Sunday they are going to slam that door shut. The key factor in this game will the Quarterbacks. Peyton Manning always seems to get better the 2nd time he faces a defense and I have no doubt that he’ll have a very strong performance in this game. On the other side, Mark Sanchez will be the chink in the Jets armor. They have a great running game but the Colts offense will force New York to go to the air. When this happens the rookie QB will struggle.

Final Prediction: Colts win 35-17


Minnesota Vikings(12-4) @ New Orleans Saints (13-3)

Not surprisingly largely pro-Brett Favre popular media are over-rating the Vikings and overlooking the Saints. Favre was great last week and has been great most of the season but the only Brett Favre talk that will be going on after this game is whether he’s returning for another season. Why do I like the Saints?

1. Location, Location, Location

The Saints are tough at home. They did drop 2 in the Superdome so they’re not invincible. However the Vikings just don’t always seem to have the same fire on the road. They only finished .500 on the road this season with all 4 of their losses coming outside the comforts of the Metrodome.

2. The Greatest Show on Turf

As a Rams fan I often find myself reminiscing about the “Greatest Show on Turf” days. In all honesty though, I really have to look no further than the Saints. Sean Payton‘s high powered offense reminds so much of the Juggernaut Rams teams a few back. The Saints do a great job of protecting Drew Brees so I really just don’t see the Vikings pass rush slowing the Saints down.

3. The Saints Defense

That’s right I’m talking about the Saints defense. This team knows how to force turnovers. The defense will come up big and be the unsung hero of this game. When you’re watching the recap of this game you’ll likely see nothing but flashy offense but my gut tells me the defense will win this game for the Saints.

Final Prediction: Saints win 42-35

The overlooked History of Illegal Drugs in Baseball

Too often people are sheep when it comes to discussing performance enhancing and or illegal drugs  in our beloved pastime. Way too many fans ignorantly believe our beloved pastime was pure before Jose Canseco and his bash brother twin  Mark McGwire rose to prominence. Is it the fan’s fault for being blindly led by media figures into believing that the stars of the steroid era were the evil villains out to ruin baseball? No. I think much of the blame can be placed obviously with MLB itself. However the biggest mis-leader of the sheep is the MEDIA.

Let’s face it, baseball has been dirty for several decades. If this is a shock to you then you need to turn off ESPN and do some research. And since you’re here I’ll lead you in the right direction…..Amphetamines (AKA Greenies). Beginning in the 60s and lasting all the way up to their 2005 ban, illegal amphetamines were the most widely abused drug in baseball. Pete Rose and Hank Aaron are two of the biggest names that have confessed to amphetamine use. In addition, Willie Mays and Willie Stargell have been linked to both the use and selling of those illegal little green pills.  The use of amphetamines were so rampant during the 70s that it is said that there were 2 coffee pots in team clubhouses. But one of them wasn’t your standard decaf. One of the two pots was not laced with amphetamines. Plus, teams were lacing everything with them. So even if a player from the 70s says he didn’t take them then there is still a very good chance that he took them without even knowing about it.

If this is news to you then you are probably now saying, “So what? Speed is nothing compared to steroids.” I’m not going to debate which substance is the greater performance enhancer because I do believe steroids enhance performance more than amphetamines. However it’s interesting to note that home run totals dropped more after the amphetamine ban than they did when steroid testing began. It’s also interesting to note that Hank Aaron claimed to have only used them once while slumping in 1968. After 1968 he had an immediate resurgence at the plate. Was he taking amphetamines on a regular basis after 1968? Most likely he was. Would any of us believe Roger Clemens if he said he only took steroids once? Hell no we wouldn’t! The point I’m getting too is it impossible to speculate on how much a substance enhanced a player. It is quite possible that without the aid of speed Hammering Hank never would have became the All-Time Home Run Leader. But there is no way to prove that one way or another. It’s just speculation. we can speculate as much as we want but we’ll never know how good a player would have been without the aid of an illegal substance.

Could Aaron have reached 715 without a little extra help?

It’s also important to note the difference in media coverage today. Could you imagine there was 24/7 sports coverage in the 60s and 70s? If there was then Hammering Hank and every other player would have been criticized like the players that have been linked to steroids. Just think about all the talk that would have swirled around Aaron in his pursuit of the Babe’s record. Every sports reporter would question whether or not he was on amphetamines. All the talk would be about whether or not he should be honored as the true HR champ.

It’s funny how much technology changes society. Today’s media coverage is unreal. I just wish the aging members of the mainstream media would not overlook the figures that were icons during their youth. The fact that they give those players a free pass while crucifying today’s players is ridiculous.

The Pub is Coming Back

The Pub has been unmanned for a few months now. And that’s just not cool.

Time for me to bring it back! I won’t be posting daily but hopefully I can achieve 1-3 quality posts per week. There are plenty of topics out there for me to talk about so I really won’t have any excuse for not making a post every now and then.

Steroids in Baseball: The Great Hypocrisy

With McGwire’s recent steroid admission this blog experienced a dramatic increase in traffic. SO I thought it’d be a good time to republish a piece that summarizes my thoughts on steroids in baseball.
Of course he juiced but why deny him the Hall of Fame?

Of course he juiced but why deny him the Hall of Fame?

Sammy Sosa recently said “I will calmly wait for my induction to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Don’t I have the numbers to be inducted?”  However it looks as if Slammin Sammy will be the latest casualty of the steroid era not to be inducted into the Hall of Fame. Mark McGwire, Roger Clemens, Sammy Sosa and Barry Bonds all have the necessary numbers to reach the Hall of Fame but they likely will never receive a spot in Cooperstown. Why? Here’s the reasons why voters say they are not worthy.

1. They are Cheaters: They cheated themselves and the game. They broke the rules and cheaters just don’t belong in Cooperstown.

2. They gained an Extra Edge:The substances they took were illegal and gave them an extra boost that led to inflated numbers that they likely would not have achieved naturally.

3. It’s a matter of Integrity: We just can’t forever enshrine people like that in baseball’s sacred Hall of Fame.

Those are three most common reasons why people believe anyone that juiced isn’t Hall of Fame worthy. Right now, I want you to honestly think about why you do not believe that these players belong in the HOF. More likely than not your reason(s) fall into one of these categories. If that is the case then guess what?


Don’t believe me? Take 5 minutes of your time to read the the remainder of this posting and think about it unbiasedly.

1. They are Cheaters

Would Perry be in Cooperstown without cheating?

Would Perry be in Cooperstown without cheating?

So in your opinion, even though there was absolutely no penalties in baseball for what they did, they are cheaters and don’t belong in the Hall of Fame. Okay. I respect you for taking such a strong stance against cheaters. Then again, what about Gaylord Perry? Or even George Brett? Perry was a notorious cheater that would not have had HOF worthy numbers without doctoring the ball and sneaking substances under the bill of his cap or throwing the occasional spit ball. Yet he’s in the Hall. George Brett was busted in the notorious pine tar incident. He’s a very minor example of cheating and I chose him for a reason. He cheated and was caught. Doesn’t that make him a cheater and put him in the same category as Perry? Should we ban everyone that has ever cheated? Baseball has a long history of cheating. Players have always tried bending and breaking the rules in order to gain an edge over their opponent. Baseball culture has always lived by the adage that “if you ain’t cheatin you ain’t tryin.” But now all of the sudden we don’t like cheaters? Okay I can respect that but only as long as every player that has ever cheated in one shape or another is removed from the hall as well. After all, we wouldn’t want lil Timmy to get the wrong idea about right and wrong.

2. They gained an extra Edge

Even the great Willie Mays has been linked to PEDs.

Even the great Willie Mays has been linked to PEDs.

They say: Players that use illegal substances to gain an edge have no place in baseball or Cooperstown.  If that’s so then why is there already at least 2 decade’s worth of amphetamine users in the Hall? Amphetamine use was rampant and accepted in baseball during the late 60’s well into the 80’s. Willie Mays, Pete Rose and Willie Stargell are just 3 of literally hundreds if not thousands of players that used amphetamines. Why is there no media outrage about the “greenie” era of baseball? Players were popping those illegal little green pills like candy. Amphetamines boost a player’s energy level and enhance focus. They are a Performance Enhancing Drug. They may not directly lead to increased muscle but they did allow players to do much more despite fatigue. They without a doubt enhanced players numbers in some way shape or form. The media likes to make everyone think that baseball was pure before the Bash Brothers but that’s nothing more than a fairy tale. Amazingly, amphetamines were not banned in baseball until 2006! Yet another incident of MLB ignoring and profiting off of a PED. Could you imagine what it would have been like if the media was everywhere 35yrs ago like they are today? Perhaps Mays and Stargell would have been blackballed from the HOF and Rose would have 2 wrongs to account for. Steroids likely enhance numbers more significantly than the greenies but all I’m saying is they both are wrong and enhance performance. Yet, one is accepted/ignored and the other one isn’t. That makes absolutely no sense.

3. It’s a matter of Integrity

Cobb was a great player but was he a man of integrity?

Cobb was a great player but was he a man of integrity?

This is my personal favorite. “These juicers are low down pieces of garbage and don’t belong there.” So you want your Hall of Famers to be “Men of Integrity”? The definition of integrity is: Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code. Sounds great doesn’t it. We don’t want immoral or unethical people in the HOF. Right? If that’s the case then why do we have so many unethical people in the HOF? Racists, Drunks, Abusers of Women, Cheaters on the field and in Marriage guess what they are there. For example take Ty Cobb, a man of little integrity. He intentionally spiked opponents, drank too much and was definitely a racist. Cobb did one thing well. And that one thing was baseball. He was one of the greatest players of all time despite not being much of a likable character. On his plaque all of his phenomenal baseball achievements are listed. We remember him as one of the best players of his era but we don’t forget that he is not a role model for our children. It’s fine if you want to view all the alleged juicers as poor people of no integrity. Just don’t overlook the fact that in an era of juicers they were still the best of the best.

In conclusion, this is just another product of today’s oversensitive society. Generation after generation of baseball player has watched their elders bend and break the rules to gain an edge. It was only a matter of time before players turned to steroids. The fans and the media had always turned a blind eye or even embraced the things that players did to gain an edge. Yet all of the sudden, some people got their feelings hurt when they realized that players were achieving historic numbers unnaturally. The over politically correctness of today then labeled this latest edge as something that harms and corrupts the youth. The witch-hunt soon followed. All I’ve got to say is where was baseball at? Where was the media when writers were making money writing about the historic homerun chase of 1998? Where were the fans? Baseball should have started testing 20+ years ago. The media and fans should have voiced more concern over the unnatural bulking up players. No one did anything. Now people are fabricating reasons for keeping the best of players of the era out of the Cooperstown. We don’t have to accept or like what they did but the best players of an era deserve to be in the HOF. Especially, when there were no penalties for what they did.

Like I said before, if your reasoning for keeping steroid users out of the hall is one of the 3 points above then you my friend, are a Hypocrite.